Reference scenario
RBA cash rate up from 3.85 to 4.50, simulated over two years. This is the demo scenario from the specification, run live on every page load — engine 1.0.0, 250 Monte Carlo draws.
Demo simulation — not an official forecast. The baseline economy is dimensionally correct and in the right neighbourhood of published Australian aggregates, but it is not an official extract. Every relationship is calibrated rather than estimated by this project. Results are scenario estimates, not predictions.
Headline indicators
Baseline path, scenario, change and confidence at the two-year horizon.
| Indicator | Baseline | Scenario | Change | P10 – P90 | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average mortgage repayment | $4,254 | $4,461 | +4.9% | $4,401 – $4,516 | High |
| House prices | $922k | $885k | −4.0% | $867k – $896k | Medium |
| Dwelling approvals | 185k | 178k | −3.6% | 176k – 180k | High |
| Budget balance | -$28.0bn | -$29.9bn | −$1.9bn | -$30.5bn – -$29.3bn | High |
| Financial stress index | 46.0 | 47.5 | +1.5 pts | 45.8 – 49.6 | Low |
| RBA cash rate | 3.85% | 4.49% | +0.64pp | 4.48% – 4.50% | High |
| Modelled Wellbeing Index | 59.2 | 58.6 | −0.6 pts | 57.9 – 59.0 | Low |
| Average outstanding mortgage rate | 6.05% | 6.60% | +0.55pp | 6.51% – 6.70% | High |
| Real GDP | $2.66tn | $2.65tn | −0.51% | $2.64tn – $2.65tn | Medium |
| Household disposable income | $1.70tn | $1.71tn | +0.35% | $1.70tn – $1.71tn | High |
| Rents | $717 | $719 | +0.35% | $718 – $721 | Medium |
| Consumer spending | $1.73tn | $1.72tn | −0.31% | $1.72tn – $1.73tn | High |
| Unemployment rate | 4.20% | 4.32% | +0.12pp | 4.27% – 4.39% | High |
| Inflation | 2.70% | 2.64% | −0.06pp | 2.58% – 2.68% | High |
| Wage growth | 3.30% | 3.27% | −0.03pp | 3.25% – 3.29% | High |
| Prosperity Index | 58.4 | 58.4 | +0.0 pts | 58.0 – 58.8 | Low |
| Population | 28.55m | 28.55m | −0.00% | 28.55m – 28.55m | High |
| Net overseas migration | 260k | 260k | 0.00% | 260k – 260k | High |
What the engine says about it
Executive summary
Generated by the deterministic narrator from the computed result.
Under the selected assumptions, RBA cash rate up from 3.85 to 4.50 produces the following over 2 years. Budget balance falls by $1.9bn; RBA cash rate rises by 0.64pp; Average outstanding mortgage rate rises by 0.55pp; Average mortgage repayment rises by 4.9%; House prices falls by 4.0%. On the household side, roughly 826k households end up better off in cash terms and 5.5m households worse off, with the remainder largely unaffected. The Modelled Wellbeing Index — a weighted composite of material and security proxies, not a measure of happiness — moves -0.68 points to 58.5.
In the first six months, RBA cash rate rises to +0.65pp; Average outstanding mortgage rate rises to +0.05pp; Average mortgage repayment rises to +0.10%. Then Financial stress index rises to +0.3 pts; First home buyer access falls to −0.2 pts; Investor demand falls to −0.09%. Then House prices falls to −0.18%; Price to income ratio falls to −0.18%; Inflation falls to −0.02pp. Transmission is fastest where a price is administered — interest rates, excise, subsidy rates — and slowest where behaviour has to change.
Between six months and two years, Budget balance falls to −$302.6m; Dwelling approvals falls to −0.70%; Job vacancies falls to −0.55%. Then Underemployment rate rises to +0.23pp; Unemployment rate rises to +0.12pp; Modelled Wellbeing Index falls to −0.6 pts.
The averages hide the distribution. recent buyers with large mortgages lose about $227 a month, while established mortgage holders lose about $185 a month. Meanwhile outright owners approaching retirement gain about $43 a month, and retirees with savings gain about $34 a month. That gap — not the aggregate — is usually what determines whether a policy survives contact with the public.
Two forces work against the headline result. Construction capacity loop: Trying to build more bids up the cost of building, which chokes off part of the increase. The reason a large approvals target delivers less than it promises. Housing supply loop: Higher prices induce building, which adds to the stock, which eventually lowers prices. The loop is real but extremely slow — the dwelling stock moves about 1.5% a year.
Start from a question
Pre-built scenarios covering the levers most often debated.
RBA raises rates 25bp
How far does one rate rise travel, and who feels it?
SimulateRBA raises rates 50bp
What does half a point cost mortgage holders, and what does it buy in inflation?
SimulateRBA cuts rates 25bp
Who gains from a cut, and what does it do to house prices?
SimulateMigration +100,000 a year
Does a larger intake make the economy bigger, or just the country more crowded?
SimulateMigration −100,000 a year
How much rental relief does a smaller intake actually buy, and at what cost?
SimulateBuild 100,000 extra homes
How long does building more take to reach rents — and does the construction sector have the capacity?
SimulateIncome tax cut
How much of a tax cut reaches spending, and how much reaches inflation?
SimulateMinimum wage +5%
What does a real wage floor increase do to prices and to employment?
SimulateIncrease JobSeeker 25%
What does raising the lowest incomes do to poverty, and what does it cost?
SimulateCombined housing package
Does attacking housing affordability from every side work better than any single lever?
SimulatePolicySandbox.ai provides scenario modelling and research tools. Results are estimates based on models, assumptions and available data, and should not be interpreted as guaranteed forecasts or as financial, legal, medical or government advice.